A Catholic bioethics institute has criticised a decision by the British High Court to allow doctors to withdraw ventilation from a brain-damaged boy on the grounds that he was very likely – though not definitely – dead. Source: Crux.
“It seems extraordinary that questions of life and death should be matters of a balance of probability rather than determination beyond reasonable doubt,” said a statement posted on the website of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre, an institute serving the Catholic Church in the UK and Ireland.
“No one would suggest burying someone who was ‘more likely than not’ to be dead,” the statement said.
Archie Battersbee, 12, was found at home by his mother on April 7 with a ligature around his neck after allegedly taking part in a social media challenge called “blackout,” in which people choke themselves up to the point that they pass out. Doctors at the Royal London Hospital have concluded that Archie, who has not regained consciousness, is “brain stem dead”.
But his mother, Hollie Dance, has legally contested their decision to withdraw his ventilation and harvest his organs on the grounds that he is able to communicate with her by squeezing her hand and that his heart is still beating.
A judge at the High Court in London ruled in favour of the doctors at a June 13 hearing, deciding on the “balance of probabilities” that it was more likely than not that the boy, from Essex, had died.
On June 20, the High Court granted Ms Dance and Archie’s father, Paul Battersbee, permission to lodge an appeal against the judgment on one of nine submitted grounds, with the other eight dismissed as having “no merit”.
The judge accepted that no evidence had showed “beyond reasonable doubt” that the boy was dead and that the parents should have the right to ask judges of the Court of Appeal to consider arguments around the “standard of proof” in the case.
The Anscombe statement said the June 13 ruling was in clear conflict with Catholic medical ethics.
“‘Very likely dead’ is not dead enough,” it said.
FULL STORY
British bioethics center: ‘Very likely dead’ is not dead enough (By Simon Caldwell, CNS via Crux)
